Well the C3 is a fine phone as far as I know for messaging as it has a full keyboard. But after my horrible experience with the Nokia 1661 and 1616 I'm glad I no longer use these. Not so much for messaging but due to the horrible volume that is simply impossible to hear. How Nokia produced a phone that has a volume so low that renders the phone unusable is beyond me. How 7 Eleven would happily sell this junk is also beyond me.
Guess it's my fault for falling for the whole free phone marketing bs with the $100 voucher. I still like the plan but never again will use another cheapo nokia.
Nokia has many problems. Wife spent $700 on a Nokia N95 when these came out a few years ago just to stop using it due to horrible battery life. We're talking useless. How useless? It hasn't been used in years. $700 well spent isn't it? Yet that was one incredible phone, the first to sport a 5 megapixel camera and great video capture. But they failed miserably with a battery that is useless. So at the end: major fail.
Sure, one shouldn't expect much from a low end phone and lets face it, these cheapo nokia phones are rugged and never die. yes, we dropped one in the Bow river and it worked fine the next day. We got a bit of condensation into a Blackberry that was put inside a bag with the kid's sippy cup and the phone died completely. But for Nokia to make a phone that is impossible to hear is not acceptable, be it free or not.
That's my point when I refer to Nokia as crappy phones. It has cost us enough, so never again. Last week I also bought a cheapo sony ericsson to use as a back up and it's a great little phone with a decent camera, good volume and all. Why can't nokia put a half decent camera on their low end phones? I mean, have they not figured out that VGA is not acceptable?